ČSN EN ISO 14050 - Environmentální management – Slovník
| Stáhnout normu: | ČSN EN ISO 14050 (Zobrazit podrobnosti) Zákazníci, kteří mají na svém počítači sjednanou od České agentury pro standardizaci (ČAS) službu ČSN on-line pro elektronický přístup do plných textů norem v pdf (verzi pro firmy nebo pro jednotlivce), mohou zde přímo otevírat citované ČSN. |
| Datum vydání/vložení: | 2021-03-01 |
| Třidící znak: | 010950 |
| Obor: | Systémy environmentálního managementu |
| ICS: |
|
| Stav: | Platná |
- 3.1.1 organization
- 3.1.2 interested party stakeholder
- 3.1.3 top management
- 3.1.4 management system
- 3.1.5 policy
- 3.1.6 objective
- 3.1.7 risk
- 3.1.8 hazard
- 3.1.9 process
- 3.1.10 competence
- 3.1.11 documented information
- 3.1.12 performance
- 3.1.13 continual improvement
- 3.1.14 effectiveness
- 3.1.15 requirement
- 3.1.16 conformity
- 3.1.17 nonconformity
- 3.1.18 corrective action
- 3.1.19 audit
- 3.1.20 measurement
- 3.1.21 monitoring
- 3.2.1 environmental management
- 3.2.2 environment
- 3.2.3 ecosystem
- 3.2.4 ecosystem service
- 3.2.5 natural resource
- 3.2.6 environmental baseline
- 3.2.7 target group
- 3.2.8 third party
- 3.2.9 sustainable development
- 3.2.10 prevention of pollution
- 3.2.11 area of concern
- 3.2.12 environmental topic area
- 3.2.13 methodology
- 3.2.14 transparency
- 3.2.15 benchmark
- 3.2.16 equity share
- 3.2.17 local authority
- 3.2.18 site
- 3.2.19 facility
- 3.2.20 environmental aspect
- 3.2.21 environmental impact pathway
- 3.2.22 environmental impact
- 3.2.23 environmental impact factor
- 3.2.24 indicator
- 3.2.25 key performance indicator KPI
- 3.2.26 combined indicator
- 3.2.27 environmental performance
- 3.2.28 environmental performance evaluation EPE
- 3.2.29 environmental performance indicator EPI
- 3.2.30 management performance indicator MPI
- 3.2.31 operational performance indicator OPI
- 3.2.32 environmental condition indicator
- 3.2.33 environmental condition
- 3.2.34 sphere of influence
- 3.2.35 trade-off
- 3.3.1 environmental management system EMS
- 3.3.2 environmental policy
- 3.3.3 environmental objective
- 3.3.4 compliance obligation
- 3.3.5 maturity level
- 3.3.6 procedure
- 3.4.1 verification conformity assessment
- 3.4.2 verification statement
- 3.4.3 verification team
- 3.4.4 verification body
- 3.4.5 verifier
- 3.4.6 verification plan
- 3.4.7 verification report
- 3.4.8 environmental claim verification
- 3.4.9 technology
- 3.4.10 environmental technology
- 3.4.11 environmental technology verification
- 3.4.12 environmental added value
- 3.4.13 intrusive investigation
- 3.4.14 professional scepticism
- 3.4.15 completeness check
- 3.4.16 consistency check
- 3.4.17 sensitivity check
- 3.4.18 test body
- 3.4.19 test plan
- 3.4.20 test report
- 3.4.21 validation
- 3.4.22 validation statement
- 3.4.23 validation team
- 3.4.24 validation body
- 3.4.25 validator
- 3.4.26 complaint
- 3.4.27 validation criteria
- 3.4.28 level of assurance
- 3.4.29 conflict of interest
- 3.4.30 accreditation
- 3.4.31 accreditation body
- 3.4.32 objective evidence
- 3.4.33 audit client
- 3.4.34 auditee
- 3.4.35 audit team
- 3.4.36 technical expert
- 3.4.37 auditor
- 3.4.38 combined audit
- 3.4.39 joint audit
- 3.4.40 internal audit
- 3.4.41 audit programme
- 3.4.42 audit scope
- 3.4.43 audit plan
- 3.4.44 audit criteria
- 3.4.45 audit evidence
- 3.4.46 audit findings
- 3.4.47 audit conclusion
- 3.4.48 certification
- 3.4.49 environmental information validation
- 3.4.50 environmental information verification
- 3.4.51 environmental information statement environmental information claim
- 3.5.1 product system
- 3.5.2 process energy
- 3.5.3 product flow
- 3.5.4 energy use
- 3.5.5 product system value
- 3.5.6 product system value indicator
- 3.5.7 product standard
- 3.5.8 fitness for purpose
- 3.5.9 product environmental criteria
- 3.5.10 product environmental aspect
- 3.5.11 performance tracking of an organization
- 3.5.12 product
- 3.5.13 co-product
- 3.5.14 intermediate product
- 3.5.15 final product
- 3.5.16 service life
- 3.5.17 consumer
- 3.5.18 raw material
- 3.5.19 release
- 3.5.20 design and development
- 3.5.21 product function characteristic
- 3.5.22 ecodesign
- 3.5.23 recyclable
- 3.5.24 upgradability
- 3.5.25 double counting
- 3.5.26 packaging
- 3.5.27 supply chain
- 3.5.28 value chain
- 3.6.1 life cycle
- 3.6.2 life cycle assessment LCA
- 3.6.3 life cycle inventory analysis
- 3.6.4 life cycle inventory analysis result
- 3.6.5 life cycle impact assessment LCIA
- 3.6.6 life cycle interpretation
- 3.6.7 functional unit
- 3.6.8 system boundary
- 3.6.9 unit process
- 3.6.10 ancillary input
- 3.6.11 feedstock energy
- 3.6.12 elementary flow
- 3.6.13 energy flow
- 3.6.14 intermediate flow
- 3.6.15 reference flow
- 3.6.16 allocation
- 3.6.17 environmental mechanism
- 3.6.18 impact category
- 3.6.19 impact category indicator
- 3.6.20 weighting factor
- 3.6.21 cut-off criteria
- 3.6.22 category endpoint
- 3.6.23 characterization factor
- 3.6.24 uncertainty analysis
- 3.6.25 sensitivity analysis
- 3.6.26 organizational life cycle assessment OLCA
- 3.6.27 critical review
- 3.6.28 critical review statement
- 3.6.29 critical review report
- 3.6.30 commissioner of the critical review
- 3.6.31 independent external expert
- 3.6.32 independent internal expert
- 3.6.33 life cycle thinking life cycle perspective LCT
- 3.6.34 primary data
- 3.6.35 secondary data
- 3.6.36 basic data
- 3.6.37 physical object
- 3.6.38 site-specific data
- 3.6.39 quantitative data
- 3.6.40 quantitative information
- 3.6.41 data generator
- 3.6.42 data documentation format
- 3.6.43 data documentor
- 3.6.44 data commissioner
- 3.6.45 data field
- 3.6.46 data quality
- 3.6.47 information module
- 3.6.48 eco-efficiency
- 3.6.49 eco-efficiency indicator
- 3.6.50 eco-efficiency profile
- 3.6.51 comparative eco-efficiency assertion
- 3.7.1 environmental label
- 3.7.2 ecolabelling body
- 3.7.3 environmental claim
- 3.7.4 self-declared environmental claim
- 3.7.5 qualified environmental claim
- 3.7.6 explanatory statement
- 3.7.7 comparative assertion
- 3.7.8 Type I environmental labelling programme
- 3.7.9 Type III environmental declaration
- 3.7.10 Type III environmental declaration programme
- 3.7.11 declared unit
- 3.7.12 product category rules PCR
- 3.7.13 product category rules review PCR review
- 3.7.14 product category rules committee PCR committee
- 3.7.15 core rules
- 3.7.16 programme operator
- 3.7.17 footprint
- 3.7.18 footprint communication
- 3.7.19 environmental communication
- 3.7.20 environmental communication policy
- 3.7.21 environmental communication objective
- 3.7.22 environmental communication target
- 3.7.23 environmental communication strategy
- 3.8.1 climate
- 3.8.2 climate scenario
- 3.8.3 climate change
- 3.8.4 climate action
- 3.8.5 adaptation to climate change climate change adaptation
- 3.8.6 climate change mitigation
- 3.8.7 adaptive capacity
- 3.8.8 environmental integrity
- 3.8.9 eligibility criteria
- 3.8.10 climate change impact
- 3.8.11 climate sensitivity
- 3.8.12 climate change risk climate risk
- 3.8.13 vulnerability
- 3.8.14 vulnerability assessment
- 3.8.15 climate change exposure
- 3.8.16 land
- 3.8.17 arable land
- 3.8.18 land use LU
- 3.8.19 direct land use change dLUC
- 3.8.20 indirect land use change iLUC
- 3.8.21 agroecosystem
- 3.8.22 biodiversity biological diversity
- 3.8.23 biogenic
- 3.8.24 biogenic carbon
- 3.8.25 biomass
- 3.8.26 transformation
- 3.9.1 greenhouse gas GHG
- 3.9.2 global warming potential GWP
- 3.9.3 carbon dioxide equivalent CO2e CO2 equivalent
- 3.9.4 greenhouse gas source GHG source
- 3.9.5 greenhouse gas sink GHG sink
- 3.9.6 greenhouse gas reservoir GHG reservoir
- 3.9.7 sector
- 3.9.8 greenhouse gas emission GHG emission
- 3.9.9 direct greenhouse gas emission direct GHG emission
- 3.9.10 indirect greenhouse gas emission indirect GHG emission
- 3.9.11 energy indirect greenhouse gas emission energy indirect GHG emission
- 3.9.12 other indirect greenhouse gas emission other indirect GHG emission
- 3.9.13 downstream greenhouse gas emission downstream GHG emission
- 3.9.14 upstream greenhouse gas emission upstream GHG emission
- 3.9.15 out of stream greenhouse gas emission out of stream GHG emission
- 3.9.16 avoided greenhouse gas emission avoided GHG emission
- 3.9.17 greenhouse gas emission reduction GHG emission reduction
- 3.9.18 baseline scenario greenhouse gas baseline scenario GHG baseline scenario
- 3.9.19 base year
- 3.9.20 greenhouse gas emission factor GHG emission factor
- 3.9.21 directed action
- 3.9.22 greenhouse gas removal GHG removal
- 3.9.23 greenhouse gas removal enhancement GHG removal enhancement
- 3.9.24 greenhouse gas removal factor GHG removal factor
- 3.9.25 direct greenhouse gas removal direct GHG removal
- 3.9.26 greenhouse gas project GHG project
- 3.9.27 greenhouse gas project proponent GHG project proponent
- 3.9.28 greenhouse gas programme GHG programme
- 3.9.29 greenhouse gas inventory GHG inventory
- 3.9.30 greenhouse gas information system GHG information system
- 3.9.31 greenhouse gas activity data GHG activity data
- 3.9.32 greenhouse gas report GHG report
- 3.9.33 greenhouse gas statement GHG statement
- 3.9.34 greenhouse gas consultancy services GHG consultancy services
- 3.9.35 verification
- 3.9.36 validation
- 3.9.37 intended user
- 3.9.38 materiality
- 3.9.39 responsible party
- 3.10.1 water footprint
- 3.10.2 water footprint inventory
- 3.10.3 direct water footprint inventory
- 3.10.4 indirect water footprint inventory
- 3.10.5 water footprint inventory analysis
- 3.10.6 water footprint assessment
- 3.10.7 water footprint impact assessment
- 3.10.8 water footprint profile
- 3.10.9 water body
- 3.10.10 water quality
- 3.10.11 water availability
- 3.10.12 water scarcity
- 3.10.13 water use
- 3.10.14 water withdrawal
- 3.10.15 freshwater
- 3.10.16 brackish water
- 3.10.17 seawater
- 3.10.18 surface water
- 3.10.19 groundwater
- 3.10.20 fossil water
- 3.10.21 water degradation
- 3.10.22 water table
- 3.10.23 drainage basin
- 3.10.24 elementary water flow
- 3.11.1 carbon footprint of a product CFP
- 3.11.2 partial carbon footprint of a product partial CFP
- 3.11.3 carbon footprint of a product – product category rules CFP–PCR
- 3.11.4 carbon footprint of a product study CFP study
- 3.11.5 carbon offsetting
- 3.12.1 management accounting
- 3.12.2 environmental benefit
- 3.12.3 co-benefit
- 3.12.4 discounting
- 3.12.5 financial control
- 3.12.6 monetary valuation
- 3.12.7 monetary value
- 3.12.8 reference unit of monetary value
- 3.12.9 total economic value
- 3.12.10 use value
- 3.12.11 non-use value
- 3.12.12 externality external effect
- 3.12.13 internalization
- 3.12.14 willingness to pay WTP
- 3.12.15 willingness to accept compensation WTA
- 3.12.16 environmental dependency
- 3.12.17 environmental dependency pathway
- 3.12.18 environmental cost
- 3.12.19 value transfer
- 3.12.20 revealed preference
- 3.12.21 stated preference
- 3.12.22 external environmental cost
- 3.12.23 external environmental benefit
- 3.12.24 affected human population
- 3.12.25 equity weighting
- 3.12.26 reference situation baseline
- 3.12.27 good
- 3.12.28 marginal utility
- 3.12.29 cost
- 3.12.30 material flow
- 3.12.31 material flow cost accounting
- 3.12.32 material distribution percentage
- 3.12.33 material balance
- 3.12.34 cost allocation
- 3.12.35 cost assignment
- 3.12.36 system cost
- 3.12.37 energy cost
- 3.12.38 energy loss
- 3.12.39 material cost
- 3.12.40 waste management cost
- 3.12.41 environment-related internal cost
- 3.12.42 environment-related internal benefit
- 3.12.43 environmental dependency cost
- 3.12.44 environmental damage cost
- 3.12.45 quantity centre
‹
Nahlásit chybu
3.7.6 explanatory statement
explanation that is needed or given so that an environmental claim (3.7.3) can be properly understood by a purchaser, potential purchaser or user of the product (3.5.12)
3.7.6 vysvětlující sdělení
vysvětlení, které je potřebné nebo je podáno, tak aby odběratel, potenciální odběratel nebo uživatel produktu (3.5.12) mohli environmentální tvrzení (3.7.3) správně pochopit